Sphincter-saving operation with coloanal anastomosis (CAA) has become an established option for very low rectal cancer, but few studies have compared its functional results and quality of life (QoL) with abdominoperineal resection (APR) showing controversial results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated for low rectal cancer with APR or CAA, disease-free after a median follow-up period of 26.5 (8-84) and 52.5 (12-156) months, respectively, were retrospectively reviewed. General and disease-specific changes in QoL and severity of disease were evaluated by Karnofsky scale, EORTC-C30, EORTC-CR38, SF-36, PGWBI, FIQL, PAC-QoL, ICIQ-SF, Stoma-QoL, AMS, Wexner's score and obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) score. RESULTS: Twenty-six APR patients and 34 CAA patients entered the study. Karnofsky score did not show significant differences. The median Stoma-QoL was 58.2 (45-76.6), indicating a good stoma function in 95 % of patients. EORTC-C30, CR38, PGWBI and SF-36 questionnaires did not show significant differences between the two groups except for sexual function (better after CAA, p = 0.01). Eleven patients after APR and eight after CAA had urinary incontinence, and its severity did not differ significantly. Eighteen of 21 CAA patients complained of faecal incontinence [AMS, 80 (15-120); Wexner, 13 (2-19)] with an impact on their QoL [FIQL: lifestyle, 1.75 (0-4); coping/behaviour, 1.3 (0-3.5); depression, 2.1 (0-5.2); embarrassment, 2 (0-4.6)] and 11 complained of obstructed defecation [7.5 (3-16)] with significant consequences on QoL [PAC-QoL, 30.4 (19.2-80.3)]. CONCLUSIONS: QoL in patients with permanent stoma and in those after CAA did not differ significantly. APR patients had worse sexual function, while most CAA patients had faecal incontinence and sometime obstructed defecation, with important impact on their QoL

Abstract AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective but expensive treatment for faecal incontinence. About 50% of the patients are unresponsive for unknown reasons, hence knowledge of any factors predictive of success would be highly desirable. The aim of this study was to analyse the potential factors associated with a successful outcome of the temporary test of electrostimulation. METHOD: Eighty-five patients with faecal incontinence were tested for SNS. The cause was idiopathic in 45, iatrogenic or obstetric in 28, spinal lesion or neurological diseases in nine and anal malformation in three patients; 43 were tested with a unipolar electrode and 42 with a quadripolar electrode. The severity of faecal incontinence was evaluated using the American Medical System (AMS) score and Wexner's score. RESULTS: A positive response was obtained in 45 patients (53%); 40 (47%) were implanted with a permanent pulse generator. Responders and nonresponders were comparable in age, duration of incontinence, anal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency and diabetes. Unipolar electrode test (PNE test) was able to elicit positive responses in 18 of 43 (42%) and the quadripolar in 27 of 42 patients (P < 0.001). Type of incontinence and gender did not affect the success rate. Patients with idiopathic incontinence had a significantly higher response rate (P =0.022). Multivariate regression analysis indicated use of a quadripolar electrode as the only independent variable predicting the success of SNS (OR = 5.58, P = 0.009). Conclusion: Use of the quadripolar electrode is the only factor significantly related to the success of SNS.

BACKGROUND: : Sacral nerve stimulation has been reported as an effective treatment for constipation. OBJECTIVE: : This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of permanent sacral nerve stimulation on the treatment of idiopathic constipation resistant to medical and behavioral management over a median follow-up period of 25.6 (range, 6-96) months. DESIGN: : A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained institutional review board-approved database was performed. SETTING: : The study was performed at 2 tertiary-care European institutions with expertise in sacral nerve stimulation. PATIENTS: : Patients were considered eligible if they had had symptoms for at least 1 year and if conservative treatment had failed. INTERVENTION: : Patients were tested by percutaneous nerve evaluation before the procedure. If this evaluation was successful, patients underwent sacral nerve therapy with an implanted device. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: : Patients were evaluated by means of a bowel function diary and the Wexner constipation score. RESULTS: : A total of 48 consecutive patients (39 females, median age 50.0 years (range, 17-79 years) entered the study. Twenty-three patients were implanted with a permanent stimulator. On an intention-to-treat basis, only 14 of 48 patients (29.2%) met the definition of a successful outcome at the latest follow-up period (median, 25.6 (range, 6-96) months). The mean Wexner score decreased from 20.2 (SD 3.6) at baseline to 5.8 (SD 4.1) at the latest follow-up examination (p < 0.001). However, 6 of 14 patients (42.8%) were still using laxatives and/or enemas at the last follow-up. LIMITATIONS: : The study was limited by the pragmatic approach necessary to evaluate the results in routine clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: : This study shows that sacral nerve stimulation has limited efficacy on an intention-to-treat basis as a routinely recommended therapy for intractable idiopathic constipation.

Local recurrence continues to be a major problem in rectal cancer. After cancer removal, detection of viable cancer cells could be useful to identify patients at risk for local recurrence. Thus, aim of the study was the detection of residual peritoneal cancer cells with a possible prognostic role for local recurrence. Twenty-nine patients were operated (R0) for low (extraperitoneal) rectal cancer, without neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy. Before and immediately after cancer removal, a peritoneal lavage was done to evaluate by RT-PCR the cytokeratin 20 mRNA on isolated cells and in order to detect cancer cells by the Thin-prep test. After a median follow-up of 39 months, 5 patients died (17%), one for non-cancer-related disease, two (7%) for local recurrence and peritoneal carcinosis, and two for distant metastases. Preoperative cytology with Thin-prep test was positive in 4 patients (14%), while postoperative peritoneal cytology was positive only in 1 patient, different from the previous. No patient developed local or distal recurrence and all were disease-free at the end of the follow-up. RT-PCR analysis was positive on the peritoneal lavage after cancer removal in 11 patients. One died for unrelated cause and no one developed local recurrences. Local recurrence occurred in only 1 of the 2 patients with positive RT-PCR analysis on the first lavage and negative on the second lavage. Our study demonstrates a not important prognostic role of Thin-prep test and RT-PCR of cytokeratin 20 mRNA on the detection of patients at risk for local recurrence after curative resection of rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk reduction of cardiopulmonary bypass complications between on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients. METHODS: This multicenter, prospective, randomized, parallel trial enrolled patients for elective or urgent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting with an additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation of 6 or more. The patients in cardiogenic shock were excluded. The composite primary end point included operative mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, renal failure, reoperation for bleeding and adult respiratory distress syndrome within 30 days after surgery. The total sample size was 693 patients, according to a scheduled interim analysis at 400 patients enrolled (α-spending = 0.029, Pocock method). RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were included in the interim analysis. Randomization assigned 203 patients to on-pump and 208 patients to off-pump treatment. Of the 411 patients, 24 crossed over; thus, 195 patients were actually treated on-pump and 216 off-pump. According to the intention to treat analysis, the rate of the composite primary end point was significantly lower (unadjusted P = .009, adjusted P = .010) in the off-pump group (5.8% vs 13.3%). The risk of experiencing the primary end point was significantly greater for the on-pump group (unadjusted odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-5.10; P = .011; adjusted odds ratio, 3.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-7.14; P = .009). CONCLUSIONS: Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting reduces early mortality and morbidity in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Fibrin glue treatment of anal fistulae has been proposed to minimize the risk of faecal incontinence but its acceptance by coloproctologists is still poor because the published data is controversial. Therefore, we carried out a prospective randomized crossover trial comparing treatment with a commercial fibrin glue to classical seton treatment, with healing rate, hospital stay, healing time, faecal incontinence and postoperative pain as study outcomes. METHOD: Sixty-four homogeneous patients with trans-sphincteric anal fistulae referred to seven colorectal units were randomized to undergo fibrin glue (39 patients) or seton (25 patients) treatment. Patients failing to heal after treatment with fibrin glue were re-randomized to undergo a second injection with glue or seton treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-two of the 64 patients completed the minimum 1-year follow-up period. Twenty-one of 24 patients healed in the seton group compared with 15/38 in the fibrin glue group (P = 0.0007). The 23 failures after glue treatment were re-randomized to have a second glue injection (eight patients) or a seton treatment (15 patients). Four of the eight (50%) patients treated with a second injection of glue, and nine out of the 15 (60%) patients in the seton group, healed. Patients treated with fibrin glue reported less postoperative pain and had a shorter hospital stay than patients treated with a seton; furthermore, faecal continence and anal manometry significantly worsened after seton treatment. CONCLUSION: Seton treatment has a significantly higher probability of success compared with fibrin glue treatment but poses a higher risk of faecal incontinence. Fibrin glue could be considered as a first line of treatment for patients at risk of faecal incontinence or other comorbidities.