Tumour necrosis factor (TNF) plays an important role in the pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). TNF inhibition results in down-regulation of abnormal and progressive inflammatory processes, resulting in rapid and sustained clinical remission, improved quality of life and prevention of target organ damage. Adalimumab is the first fully human monoclonal antibody directed against TNF. In this article, we review the role and cost effectiveness of adalimumab in the treatment of IMIDs in adults and children. The efficacy and tolerability of adalimumab has been demonstrated in patients with a wide range of inflammatory conditions, leading to regulatory approval in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), plaque psoriasis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, paediatric Crohn's disease, and intestinal Behçet's disease), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The major tolerability issues with adalimumab are class effects, such as injection site reactions and increased risk of infection and lymphoma. As with all anti-TNF agents, adalimumab is immunogenic, although less than infliximab, and some patients receiving long-term adalimumab will develop anti-drug antibodies, causing a loss of response. Comparisons of its clinical utility and cost effectiveness have shown it to be a valid treatment choice in a wide range of patients. Recent data from Italian economic studies show the cost effectiveness of adalimumab to be below the threshold value for health care interventions for most indications. In addition, analysis of indirect costs shows that adalimumab significantly reduces social costs associated with RA, PsA, AS, Crohn's disease and psoriasis. The fact that adalimumab has the widest range of approved indications, many often presenting together in the same patient due to the common pathogenesis, may further improve the utility of adalimumab. Current clinical evidence shows adalimumab to be a valuable resource in the management of IMIDs. Further research, designed to identify patients who may benefit most from this drug, will better highlight the role and cost-effectiveness of this versatile TNF inhibitor.

The complex pathogenesis of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) has been extensively investigated and dysregulation of cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor (TNF) has been shown to play a dominant role in the pathogenesis of various IMIDs, such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. The subsequent development of biological agents capable of blocking TNF has led to important advances in the pharmacotherapy of such diseases and confirmed the concept of a common pathophysiology among IMIDs with TNF having a predominant role. Five TNF inhibitors have currently been approved for treatment of one or more IMIDs; these include infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, golimumab and certolizumab pegol. Given the similarities in the pathogenic background of IMIDs, one could expect that anti-TNF agents be similarly effective and with comparable tolerability profiles; however, this may not be the case. Structural and pharmacological differences among the anti-TNF drugs are likely to result in differences in efficacy and tolerability among the agents in the different IMIDs, together with differences in potency, therapeutic dose ranges, dosing regimens, administration routes, and propensity for immunogenicity. Among the five TNF inhibitors approved for treatment of IMIDs, adalimumab has the widest range of indications. Data from controlled clinical trials of adalimumab, showing its excellent efficacy and tolerability in a wide range of indications, are supported by real-world long-term data from observational studies, which confirm the value of adalimumab as a suitable choice in the management of IMIDs.

Objectives: There is evidence that fat tissue may influence the response to therapy in patients with arthritis. The aim of this study was to assess whether the body mass index (BMI) affects rates of clinical remission in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α biological drugs. Method: We retrospectively studied 135 patients with active peripheral PsA (45 obese, 47 overweight, and 43 normal-weight). Baseline BMI was correlated with the clinical response to adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab. After 36 months (median, range 6-79) of treatment, disease remission rates were assessed using the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) or the Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI). Possible predictors of clinical outcomes were assessed by multivariate analysis. Results: At baseline, BMI was significantly correlated only with the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score (r = 0.21, p = 0.02) and not with disease activity. BMI did not predict disease remission or changes in HAQ score following anti-TNF-α therapy. Obese patients showed a significantly higher HAQ score and took significantly lower doses of prednisone than normal-weight or overweight patients, but their disease remission rates on the DAS28 (37%) or the SDAI (21%) were not significantly different from those of the other two groups (44% and 21%, respectively), regardless of the TNF-α inhibitor prescribed. Conclusions: In our retrospective analysis, disease activity and clinical response to anti-TNF-α therapy in PsA do not seem to be affected by BMI. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary results. © 2013 Informa Healthcare on license from Scandinavian Rheumatology Research Foundation.

Dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) commonly cause weakness of the thigh muscles. However, it is debated whether DM and PM affect similar thigh muscles. Muscle oedema on fat-suppressed MRI sequences is thought to represent active inflammation. In this study, we aimed to assess which thigh muscle groups are preferentially inflamed in DM and PM, respectively, using short-tau inversion-recovery MRI sequences.

This study aims to evaluate the drug survival and effectiveness of ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients naïve to biologics or inadequate responders to tumor necrosis factor (TNF-IR) inhibitors in real life. PsA patients starting ustekinumab were enrolled from 2014 to 2016. Joint involvement, peripheral or axial, Psoriatic Area Severity Index, Disease Activity Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), Lee Enthesitis Index, Health Assessment Questionnaire, body mass index, comorbidities, co-therapies, mechanism of action, and causes of discontinuation of prior TNFi were collected at baseline, and 6 and 12 months. Twelve-month drug survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Hazard ratios (HRs) of drug discontinuation adjusted for baseline factors were estimated by multiple Cox regression analysis. Percentages of DAPSA-based remission, as crude value and adjusted for drug retention (LUNDEX index), were compared by χ2 test. Mean differences of DAPSA from baseline to 6 and 12 months were compared between naïve and TNF-IR patients by ANOVA. Of 160 PsA patients starting ustekinumab, 54 were naïve and 106 were TNF-IR. Twelve-month drug survival was significantly higher in naïve (87%) than in TNF-IR (68%, p = 0.01). Baseline co-therapy with methotrexate did not increase the persistence on ustekinumab. Naïve patients had the lowest risk of ustekinumab discontinuation (HR 0.27, p = 0.01), and the highest DAPSA-based remission (34%, LUNDEX 26%). Mean differences from baseline of DAPSA was significantly greater in naïve than in TNF-IR patients at 12 months (- 14.4 ± 10 vs. - 4.1 ± 17, p = 0.01). Our data showed that ustekinumab has a good effectiveness in real life and the best outcomes are achieved in biologic-naïve PsA patients.

Certolizumab pegol, a pegylated Fab' anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agent, has shown efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) unresponsive to previous treatment. In key randomised controlled trials involving patients with moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to methotrexate or one or more disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD), the efficacy of certolizumab pegol, as monotherapy or with methotrexate, was similar to that reported in other anti-TNF clinical studies, with 60% or fewer of patients achieving American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement in RA. Rapid clinical response was also seen, with significant differences evident at week 1, and efficacy maintained at study end and in open-label extensions. Adding certolizumab pegol to non-biological DMARDs is efficacious in other RA populations. In the CERTAIN study, certolizumab increased remission rates, prevented disease worsening and improved work productivity and daily activity in patients with low to moderate RA. In the REALISTIC study, rapid and consistent clinical responses were observed in a diverse group of anti-TNF-eligible RA patients representing those seen in clinical practice. In the RAPID studies, rapid and sustained reduction in RA signs and symptoms, inhibition of structural joint damage progression, and improved physical function were seen with certolizumab pegol plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone in RA patients with an incomplete response to methotrexate. Certolizumab pegol was generally well-tolerated in clinical trials, although long-term observational data are not yet available. Current data suggest that certolizumab pegol suits a 'treat to target' approach, providing rapid and sustained improvements in RA signs and symptoms, and beneficial effects on workplace and home productivity in patients with RA.

Iloprost plays an important role in the treatment of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP), but has transient vasodilatory effects owing to its very short half-time. We aimed to evaluate short- and medium-term haemodynamic effects of iloprost by measuring dorsal finger microvessel blood flow using laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF), in patients with RP associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

The GISEA registry is an independent database that was established by the Italian Group for the Study of Early Arthritis (GISEA) in 2008, funded by the Italian Association of Rheumatic Patients (ANMAR - ONLUS). In line with the network's epidemiological strategy, the initial protocol was designed to collect long-term follow-up data concerning patients with rheumatic diseases treated with biological agents in order to investigate the realworld characteristics in terms of disease activity, comorbidities and survival on treatment. We here describe the design and methodology used to collect patient data. Information concerning demographics, disease activity, treatment changes (including the reasons for changing and the duration of each therapy), concomitant therapies and adverse events is available to all the members of the study groups by means of a web-based interface that allows queries and the presentation of numerical data, as well as graphics to illustrate trends. Fourteen Italian rheumatology centres have contributed patients to the database which, at the time writing, includes 5145 patients (72% women) with a mean age of 53 years (range 16-88). The initial diagnoses were rheumatoid arthritis (3494 patients, 67.9%), psoriatic arthritis (833, 16.2%), ankylosing spondylitis (493, 9.6%), undifferentiated spondylo-arthritides (307, 5.9%), enteropathic arthritis (14, 0.3%) and spondylitis following reactive arthritis (4, 0.1%). These patients have been followed for up to 10 years, and 1927 (35.8%) have been treated for at least three years. The biological treatments received include etanercept, infliximab, anakinra, adalimumab, abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab. A total of 2926 adverse events have been observed, with 1171 patients (22%) reporting at least one. Analysis of the accumulated data will provide insights into the critical early phase of the studied arthritides, and enable us to identify the clinical and laboratory profiles that may predict responsiveness to a specific therapy.

Abnormalities of central pain processing play an important role in the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia (FM). The aims of the present study were to: 1) evaluate habituation of laser-evoked potentials (LEP) to repeated painful stimulation of 1 tender and 2 nontender points; and 2) determine correlations between LEP abnormalities and major clinical features of FM. Fourteen consecutive FM outpatients and 13 normal controls were included. LEP were recorded from scalp designations Fz, Cz, Pz, T3, and T4. The dorsum of the right hand, the right supra-orbital zone, and the right knee (a tender point in all patients) were subjected to repeated CO2 laser stimuli. For each stimulation site, recordings were obtained for 3 consecutive series of 20 stimuli. The 3 main findings in FM patients were: 1) an increased amplitude of vertex LEP and subjective laser pain; 2) decreased habituation of vertex LEP and subjective laser pain; and 3) a correlation between reduced N2 wave habituation and the severity of self-reported depressive symptoms. As with other chronic pain syndromes, the pathophysiology of FM may involve a generalized increase in the perception of painful stimuli and reduced habituation of the sensory cortex. Perspective: Reduced habituation of cortical responses to laser stimuli in FM patients suggests alterations in the pattern of cortical excitability. This is facilitated by depressive symptoms and abnormalities in central neurotransmission. These findings provide further support for the use of medications with effects on the central nervous system in the management of FM.

Objective: To evaluate the risk of serious infections (SIs) in RA patients receiving anti-TNF therapy on the basis of the data included in the GISEA register. Methods: The study involved 2769 adult patients with long-standing RA (mean age 53.2 +/- 13.4 years; mean disease duration 9.0 +/- 8.3 years) enrolled in the GISEA register, who had been treated for at least 6 months with TNF inhibitors or had discontinued therapy due to SI: 837 (30%) treated with infliximab (IFN), 802 (29%) with adalimumab (ADA), and 1130 (41%) with etanercept (ETN). Results: 176 patients had experienced at least one of the 226 Sis during the 9 years of treatment with an anti-TNF agent, an overall incidence of 31.8/1000 patient-years (95% CI 25.2-38.3): 23.7/1000 patient-years (95% CI 13.1-34.2) on ADA; 12.8/1000 patient-years (95% CI 6.3-19.4) on ETN and 65.1/1000 patient-years (95% CI 48.4-81.8) on IFN. The risk was higher in the first than in the second year of treatment, but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08) (38.9% of the SIs were recorded in the first 12 months of treatment). The risk of SI was significantly different among the three treatment groups (p<0.0001). Multivariate models confirmed that the use of steroids (p<0.046), concomitant DMARD treatment during anti-TNF therapy (p=0.004), advanced age at the start of anti-TNF treatment (p<0.0001), and the use of IFN or ADA rather than ETN (respectively p<0.0001 and p = 0.023) were strong and statistically significant predictors of infection. Conclusions: Anti-TNF therapy is associated with a small but significant risk of SI that is associated with the concomitant use of steroids, advanced age at the start of anti-TNF treatment, and the type of anti-TNF agent. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Objective The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term safety profile of anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents on the liver of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and a previously resolved hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Methods Medical records from 992 consecutive outpatients receiving anti-TNF-α therapy between 2007 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. HBV infection was assessed evaluating HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs), antibodies to hepatitis B core (anti-HBc), and HBV-DNA levels. In patients with a previously resolved HBV infection, serum levels of aminotransferase (AST/ALT) were also assessed every three months, while HBsAg and HBV-DNA every six months. Results We identified 131 consecutive patients (70 males, 61 females) with SpA and resolved HBV infection. At baseline none of the patients were positive for HBV-DNA, and AST/ALT levels were within the normal range with no subsequent increase during the observational treatment period. None received antiviral therapy prior to or during anti-TNF drug administration. At the end of the follow-up period (75.50±33.37 months) no viral reactivation was observed in anti-HBc positive patients, regardless of anti-HBs positivity. During the whole follow-up, HBV-DNA was undetectable in all patients, HBsAg remained negative, and it was not necessary to discontinue biologic therapy because of liver damage. Conclusion Our results confirm that pre-emptive antiviral prophylaxis may not be necessary routine, but strict monitoring for AST/ALT levels, as well as for changes in HBV serology and HBV-DNA remain necessary and seem a realistic and cost-effective approach to identify early viral reactivation. © Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2017.

tObjectives: The aim of this study was to assess whether body mass index (BMI) affects clinical outcomesin rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients starting a second line biological drug after failure of a first TNF-blocker.Methods: From a longitudinal cohort, we analyzed 292 RA patients (66 obese, 109 overweight, and117 normal-weight) treated with a first ever anti-TNF- drug. Patients discontinuing the therapy werefollowed-up if began a second biological drug. Drug survival, by Kaplan-Meier life analysis, and 12 monthsdisease remission based on the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) were assessed for either courseof biologics. The baseline predictors of clinical outcomes were assessed by Cox regression analysis.Results: Survival of the first anti-TNF- drug was lower in obese (39.4%) than in normal-weight (49.1%)patients, but the difference was not statistically significant. Obese patients had the highest hazard todiscontinue the first anti-TNF- drug (HR 1.64, 1.02–2.62 95% IC, P = 0.04), and the lowest percent-age of DAS28-based disease remission at 12 months (P = 0.04). In 97 (37 normal-weight, 36 overweight,24 obese) patients who started a second non-anti-TNF- biological drug, persistence on therapy wassignificantly lower in obese (43.5%) than in normal-weight (80%, P = 0.04) group, and again obesity sig-nificantly predicted drug discontinuation (HR 2.9, 1.08–8.45 95% IC, P = 0.04). Significantly, less obesepatients attained a disease remission (12%, P = 0.004) at 12 months.Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that obese RA patients poorly respond to second line non-anti-TNF- drugs after failure of a first TNF- inhibitor.

The so-called papular-purpuric gloves and socks syndrome (PPGSS) is a condition characterized by acute onset of intense erythema, edema and petechiae with a typical localization on the hands and feet, besides mucosal lesions of the oral cavity. The syndrome has a favorable and self-limited course, requiring only a symptomatic therapy. In the 50% of the cases described in literature (ninety cases in 22 years), is documented an acute infection caused by parvovirus B19 and in only two cases the onset of PPGSS is reported among different members of the same family. The aim of the work is to describe two cases of PPGSS arisen during a short time period in two family members affected by an acute parvovirus B19 infection found by serum sampling. The peculiarity of the study was the infrequence of the syndrome and the rareness of the description of PPGSS in rheumatology. This syndrome is usually described in dermatology, but it is also interesting for the rheumatologist because it comes in differential diagnosis with various autoimmune diseases.

The recent availability of biosimilars as a result of the expiry of the patents of first-generation biotechnological drugs may theoretically reduce the direct costs of such treatments, making their use accessible to a larger number of patients. However, the currently available clinical data refer to a relatively small number of patients, and do not provide sufficient information concerning long-term efficacy and safety or the frequency of rare adverse events. Given the importance of the introduction of biosimilar drugs and the limitations of our current knowledge of their efficacy and safety profiles, we believe it is mandatory to draw up a position paper for Italian Rheumatologists. Moreover, in order to guarantee their safety, it is mandatory to indicate behavioural rules for the involved specialists and competent authorities, and perform ad hoc clinical trials and appropriate drug surveillance.

Clinical research is needed to identify patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who are more likely to be responsive to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibition.

Often life-threatening pulmonary fungal infections (PFIs) can occur in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) receiving disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Most of the data concerning PFIs in RA patients come from case reports and retrospective case series. Of the ve most widely described PFIs, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has rarely been seen outside Japan, pulmonary cryptococcosis has been diagnosed in only a small number of patients worldwide, pulmonary coccidioidomycosis has almost only been observed in endemic areas, the limited number of cases of pulmonary histoplasmosis have mainly occurred in the USA, and the rare cases of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis have only been encountered in leukopenic patients. Many aspects of the prophylaxis, diagnosis and treatment of PFIs in RA patients remain to be defined, as does the role of each DMARD in increasing the risk of infection, and the possibility of resuming biological and non-biological DMARD treatment after the infection has been cured. The recommendations for the management of PFIs described in this paper are the product of a consensus procedure promoted by the Italian group for the Study and Management of Infections in Patients with Rheumatic Diseases (the ISMIR group).

To provide a survey of disease activity in patients treated with standard care in Italian clinical practice.

European and Asian studies report conflicting data on the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in rheumatologic patients with a previously resolved HBV (prHBV) infection undergoing long-term biologic therapies. In this patient category, the safety of different immunosuppressive biologic therapies, including rituximab, was assessed. A total of 1218 Caucasian rheumatologic patients, admitted consecutively as outpatients between 2001 and 2012 and taking biologic therapies, underwent evaluation of anti-HCV and HBV markers as well as liver amino transferases every 3 months. Starting from January 2009, HBV DNA monitoring was performed in patients with a prHBV infection who had started immunosuppressive biologic therapy both before and after 2009. Patients were considered to have elevated aminotransferase levels if values were >1x upper normal limit at least once during follow-up. We found 179 patients with a prHBV infection (14 treated with rituximab, 146 with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and 19 with other biologic therapies) and 959 patients without a prHBV infection or other liver disease (controls). The mean age in the former group was significantly higher than the controls. Patients with a prHBV infection never showed detectable HBV DNA serum levels or antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen/hepatitis B surface antigen seroreversion. However, when the prevalence of elevated amino transferases in patients with prHBV infection was compared to controls, it was significantly higher in the former group only for aminotransferase levels >1x upper normal limit but not when aminotransferase levels >2x upper normal limit were considered. Conclusion: Among patients with a prHBV infection and rheumatologic indications for long-term biologic therapies, HBV reactivation was not seen; this suggests that universal prophylaxis is not justified and is not cost-effective in this clinical setting. (Hepatology 2015;62:40-46)

The prevalence of sarcopenia in rheumatic diseases has been evaluated in single diseases using various diagnostic approaches, generating conflicting data on the pathogenetic mechanism(s). Herein, we evaluated both muscle mass index (MMI) and muscle strength to assess sarcopenia and presarcopenia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Moreover, we evaluated the possible impact of disease/patient-related characteristics, therapeutic regimens, and nutritional aspects on sarcopenia. The present study included 168 patients of both genders, aged 40⁻75 years. All patients underwent a nutritional evaluation, physical activity level assessment, rheumatologic evaluation, and an MMI and muscle strength assessment. The prevalence of sarcopenia was about 20% in all the three rheumatologic diseases, whereas presarcopenia was significantly different in RA, PsA and AS (p = 0.006). At multivariate analysis, only age ≥60 years and the presence of a disability were associated with a significantly increased risk of sarcopenia (p = 0.006 and p = 0.01, respectively), while a higher C-reactive protein did not reach statistical significance. Sarcopenia is similar in RA, PsA and AS, whereas presarcopenia significantly differs in these three diseases. Disease activity/inflammation and nutritional aspects do not influence sarcopenia, while age ≥60 years and the presence of a disability significantly increase the risk of sarcopenia.

Serum amyloid-A (SAA) is an acute phase protein, synthesized by the liver and previously investigated as a marker of disease activity in many rheumatologic disorders. Its significance in Beh double dagger et's disease (BD), a chronic inflammatory disorder at the crossroad between autoimmune and autoinflammatory syndromes, is still unraveled. Our aim was to assess the role of SAA levels as a potential marker of disease activity in patients with BD. According to our findings, the occurrence of oral aphthosis, neurological impairment, and ocular disease is significantly associated with SAA serum levels higher than 30, 50, and 150 mg/L, respectively. We also suggest that increased SAA levels might identify a thrombotic risk in BD with previous or concurrent vascular involvement.

To determine the adherence of practicing rheumatologists, before and after an educational project, to Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) classification criteria and to ASAS recommendations for the use of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).

OBJECTIVE: T cell costimulation is a key point in the regulation of immune tolerance, immune response, and autoimmunity. T cell activation does not take place upon the simple engagement of T cell receptor; a second signal is needed to fully stimulate T cells. There are a variety of molecules that can act as costimulators, and among those CD28/CD80 signaling plays a crucial role in modulating T cell response. Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4, CD152 (CTLA4) is a physiologic antagonist of CD28, and abatacept, a synthetic analog of CTLA4, has recently been approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis. An abnormal T cell activation is also believed to sustain psoriatic disease both at skin and joint sites. We aimed to evaluate the rationale of blocking CD28/CD80 signaling and the possible use of abatacept for treating psoriatic arthritis (PsA). METHODS: We reviewed the role of CD28/CD80 signaling in promoting T cell inflammation in psoriasis and the effects of CTLA4 modulation in experimental models of psoriasis and in humans. RESULTS: CD28/CD80 seems to be crucial in stimulating T cell activation and inflammation in psoriasis, and its inhibition by CTLA4 analogs or by anti-CD28 blocking antibodies is effective against psoriasis. Few data are available on abatacept, which seems to be valuable for the treatment of PsA but less useful in the therapy of skin psoriasis. CONCLUSION: Although the CD28 molecule is crucial in activating T cells and inflammation in psoriasis, data on the efficacy of abatacept in the treatment of PsA are still not conclusive

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, psoriasis, axial spondyloarthropathies, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis, comprise a group of chronic disorders characterized by an immune-mediated pathogenesis. Although at clinical presentation these diseases appear unrelated, they have been recognized to share similar pathogenic mechanisms. Data from epidemiological and genetic studies further support the concept that IMIDs are interrelated, as they can co-occur in the same patient and share a similar genetic susceptibility. The specific aetiologies of IMIDs remain unknown, but all are known to involve dysregulation of the immune system, including an over-expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokine tumour necrosis factor (TNF). The pivotal role played by TNF in the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of IMIDs has been documented by extensive preclinical and clinical investigations, and confirmed by the efficacy of anti-TNF biotechnological drugs, such as etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab, in the therapeutic management of these disorders. In this narrative review, we discuss the available data on the TNF-dependent pathogenesis of IMIDs and associations among the different disorders. Although much remains to be discovered about the pathogenesis and aetiology of IMIDs, their common inflammatory pathological features may explain why they can be successfully targeted by anti-TNF drugs. Among these, adalimumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody, has been approved for treatment of nine distinct IMID indications and it is likely to become a valuable therapeutic tool for this complex cluster of chronic inflammatory disorders.

Biological agents are widely used in rheumatology, dermatology and inflammatory bowel disease. Evidence about their efficacy and safety has been strengthened for all those therapeutic indications over the last decade. Biosimilar agents are monoclonal antibodies similar to previously approved biologics. In the European Union, they have been approved for all the indications in the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), although data only in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis are currently available. Direct evidence on efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of biosimilars is mandatory in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease, as well as in children. Based on the current evidence in the literature, we present the joint official position of the Italian Societies of Rheumatology, Dermatology and Inflammatory Bowel Disease on the use of biosimilars in IMIDs