Abstract

A suite of Ti-bearing garnets from magmatic, metamorphic and carbonatitic rocks was studied by Electron Probe Microanalysis (EPMA), X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD), Single Crystal X-ray Diffraction (SCXRD), Mössbauer spectroscopy and Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) in order to better characterize their crystal chemistry. The studied garnets show TiO2 varying in the ranges 4.9(1)-17.1(2) wt.% and variable Fe3+/ΣFe content. SIMS analyses allowed quantification of light elements yielding H2O in the range 0.091(7)-0.46(4), F in the range 0.004(1)-0.040(4) and Li2O in the range 0.0038(2)-0.014(2) wt%. Mössbauer analysis provided spectra with different complexity, which could be fitted to a number of components variable from one (YFe3+) to four (YFe2+, ZFe2+, YFe3+, ZFe3+). A good correlation was found between the Fe3+/ΣFe resulting from the Mössbauer analysis and that derived from the Flank method (Höfer & Brey, 2007). X-ray powder analysis revealed that the studied samples are a mixture of different garnet phases with very close cubic unit cell parameters as recently found by other authors (Antao, 2013). Single crystal X-ray refinements using anisotropic displacement parameters were performed in the Ia-3d space group and converged to R1 in the range 1.63-2.06 % and wR2 in the range 1.44-2.21 %. Unit cell parameters vary between 12.0641(1) and 12.1447(1) Å, reflecting different Ti contents and extent of substitutions at tetrahedral site. The main substitution mechanisms affecting the studied garnets are: YR4+ + ZR3+ ↔ ZSi + YR3+ (schorlomite substitution); YR2+ + ZR4+ ↔ 2YR3+ (morimotoite substitution); YFe3+↔ YR3+ (andradite substitution) with ZR4+ = Ti; YR4+ = Ti, Zr; YR3+ = Fe3+, Al3+, Cr3+; ZR3+ = Fe3+, Al3+ and YR2+ = Fe2+, Mg2+, Mn2+. The 2YTi4++ ZFe2+ ↔ 2YFe3+ + ZSi4+, the hydrogarnet substitution [(SiO4)4-↔ (O4H4)4-], the F– ↔ OH– and the YR4+ + XR+ ↔ YR3+ + XCa2+, with YR4+ = Ti, Zr; YR3+ = Fe3+, Al3+, Cr3+; XR+ = Na, Li also occur. The garnet crystal chemistry and implications in terms of nomenclature and classification (Grew et al., 2013) are discussed. Antao S.M. 2013. The mystery of birefringent garnet: is the symmetry lower than cubic?. Powder diffr., 28(4), 281-287. Grew E.S., Locock A.J., Mills S.J., Galuskina I.O., Galuskina E.V. & Hålenius U. 2013. Nomenclature of the Garnet Supergroup. Am. Mineral., 98, 785-811. Höfer H.E. & Brey G.P. 2007. The iron oxidation state of garnet by electron microprobe: Its determination with the flank method combined with major-element analysis. Am. Mineral., 92, 873-885.

Autore Pugliese

• Schingaro Emanuela , Mesto Ernesto , Ventruti Gennaro

Tutti gli autori

• SCHINGARO E.;MESTO E.;SCORDARI F.;VENTRUTI G.;LACALAMITA M.

Titolo volume/Rivista

Non Disponibile

Anno di pubblicazione

2015

ISSN

Non Disponibile

ISBN

Non Disponibile

Numero di citazioni Wos

Nessuna citazione

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Numero di citazioni Scopus

Non Disponibile

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Settori ERC

Non Disponibile

Codici ASJC

Non Disponibile