Slow runoff is not a good predictor of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. A validation study versus absolute coronary flow reserve.

Abstract

The meaning of angiographically assessed slow runoff in patients (pts) with angiographically normal coronary artery is controversial. Non-invasevely assessed absolute coronary flow reserve (CFR) in in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) by Color guided pulsed-wave Doppler is a reliable parameter to assess coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD). So this study aimed at assessing the value of slow runoff in predicting CMD. Results: We studied 38 consecutive pts with angiographically normal coronary artery that underwent non-invasive assessement of CFR in the LAD. We found that 9 pts out of 38 (group 1)had slow runoff and the remaining 29 had normal runoff (group 2). The CFR evaluated in the the 2 groups was not significantly different (see graph). CFR was infact, in the group 1 (Mean +/- SD) = 2,79+/- 0,8 and in the group 2= 2,89 +/- 0,7 (p= ns). In addition considering a CFR value =< 2,5 as index of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction, we found CMD in 3 pts of group 1 (33%) and in 8 pts of group 2 (27%) (p=ns). The calculated sensitivity and specificity of slow runoff in predicting CMD was at 44% and 64% respectively. Conclusion: Slow runoff is not a good predictor of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction and its clinical value, if any, is uncertain and probably multifactorial.


Tutti gli autori

  • CAIATI C.;LEPERA M.E.;FAVALE S.

Titolo volume/Rivista

Non Disponibile


Anno di pubblicazione

2011

ISSN

Non Disponibile

ISBN

Non Disponibile


Numero di citazioni Wos

Nessuna citazione

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile


Numero di citazioni Scopus

Non Disponibile

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile


Settori ERC

Non Disponibile

Codici ASJC

Non Disponibile