Slow runoff is not a good predictor of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. A validation study versus absolute coronary flow reserve.
Abstract
The meaning of angiographically assessed slow runoff in patients (pts) with angiographically normal coronary artery is controversial. Non-invasevely assessed absolute coronary flow reserve (CFR) in in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) by Color guided pulsed-wave Doppler is a reliable parameter to assess coronary microcirculatory dysfunction (CMD). So this study aimed at assessing the value of slow runoff in predicting CMD. Results: We studied 38 consecutive pts with angiographically normal coronary artery that underwent non-invasive assessement of CFR in the LAD. We found that 9 pts out of 38 (group 1)had slow runoff and the remaining 29 had normal runoff (group 2). The CFR evaluated in the the 2 groups was not significantly different (see graph). CFR was infact, in the group 1 (Mean +/- SD) = 2,79+/- 0,8 and in the group 2= 2,89 +/- 0,7 (p= ns). In addition considering a CFR value =< 2,5 as index of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction, we found CMD in 3 pts of group 1 (33%) and in 8 pts of group 2 (27%) (p=ns). The calculated sensitivity and specificity of slow runoff in predicting CMD was at 44% and 64% respectively. Conclusion: Slow runoff is not a good predictor of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction and its clinical value, if any, is uncertain and probably multifactorial.
Autore Pugliese
Tutti gli autori
-
CAIATI C.;LEPERA M.E.;FAVALE S.
Titolo volume/Rivista
Non Disponibile
Anno di pubblicazione
2011
ISSN
Non Disponibile
ISBN
Non Disponibile
Numero di citazioni Wos
Nessuna citazione
Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni
Non Disponibile
Numero di citazioni Scopus
Non Disponibile
Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni
Non Disponibile
Settori ERC
Non Disponibile
Codici ASJC
Non Disponibile
Condividi questo sito sui social