Reliability of narrow-band imaging (NBI) hysteroscopy: A comparative study

Abstract

Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2303-7. Epub 2010 Feb 21. Reliability of narrow-band imaging (NBI) hysteroscopy: a comparative study. Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Pastore A, Mastrolia S, Lepera A, Clevin L. Source First Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy. Cicinelli@gynecology1.uniba.it Abstract OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the usefulness of narrow-band imaging (NBI) technology for improving the diagnostic reliability of hysteroscopy. DESIGN: Prospective controlled clinical study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Three hundred ninety-five outpatient women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy were enrolled. INTERVENTION(S): All patients underwent fluid minihysteroscopy with white light (WL) and NBI exploration with endometrial eye-directed biopsy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hysteroscopic findings with WL and NBI were compared with histology, which was considered the gold standard. RESULT(S): Overall, the number of correct diagnoses with NBI was significantly higher than with WL. For differentiating normal from abnormal endometrial histopathology, the use of NBI showed a significantly higher specificity (0.93 vs. 0.78) and negative predictive value (0.92 vs. 0.81); NBI hysteroscopy significantly improved the sensitivity for the diagnosis of proliferative endometrium (0.93 vs. 0.78), chronic endometritis (0.88 vs. 0.70), low-risk hyperplasia (0.88 vs. 0.70), and high-risk hyperplasia (0.60 vs. 0.40). CONCLUSION(S): The use of NBI improved the reliability of diagnostic hysteroscopy. The high specificity and the low number of false negatives may reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies or of those performed in wrong areas. Moreover, compared with WL observation, NBI hysteroscopy showed significantly higher sensitivity for the detection of chronic endometritis and low-risk and high-risk hyperplasia. Copyright © 2010 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. PMID: 20176350 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


Tutti gli autori

  • LEPERA A.;CICINELLI E.

Titolo volume/Rivista

Non Disponibile


Anno di pubblicazione

2010

ISSN

0015-0282

ISBN

Non Disponibile


Numero di citazioni Wos

Nessuna citazione

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile


Numero di citazioni Scopus

15

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile


Settori ERC

Non Disponibile

Codici ASJC

Non Disponibile