Abstract

While lawful interests have long since acquired substantial importance, the evolution from the administrative jurisdiction of annulment to a relation-based one clashes with the impossibility of the judge to take the place of the administration. Furthermore, the reasons for the decision of annulment comply with the administrative proceedings and the control of the judge has extended to a knowledge of the facts, with the only limit of questionable assessments, which are mostly reserved for the administration alone. The difficult distinction between ascertainments and questionable assessments, as one between "weak" and "strong" judgment on proceedings relating to the facts, may not be relevant if the administrative law judge orders the verification to the same resistant administration, making the court appoint a technical consultant. But the code of administrative law procedure precludes this possibility, specifying that verifications should be asked of "a public authority, not related to the parties to the trial" and that the appointment of the court-appointed consultant is an alternative to this request.

Autore Pugliese

• Mastrangelo Donatantonio

Tutti gli autori

• MASTRANGELO D.

Titolo volume/Rivista

Non Disponibile

Anno di pubblicazione

2010

ISSN

1971-6974

ISBN

Non Disponibile

Numero di citazioni Wos

Nessuna citazione

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Numero di citazioni Scopus

Non Disponibile

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Settori ERC

Non Disponibile

Codici ASJC

Non Disponibile