Abstract

In the international framework of provisional measures a special place has to be assigned to the arrest of ships, as specifically ruled by “Arrest Convention” of 1952 and subsequently modified by the “Arrest Convention” of 1999. Differently from other tipycal or atipycal provisional measures, the judge does not evaluate circumstances like «fumus boni iuris», «good arguable case on the merits», periculum in mora, documental evidence of the credit and so on; instead, he is called to grant the arrest just on the allegation of a maritime credit: he who has not a maritime credit, expressly numbered in the list of art. 1(1), he has not the possibility to obtain the arrest of ships and, on the other hand, he who has a maritime credit as listed, he can get the remedy with nothing but alleging his credit.

Autore Pugliese

• Dalfino Domenico

Tutti gli autori

• DALFINO D.

Titolo volume/Rivista

Non Disponibile

Anno di pubblicazione

2011

ISSN

Non Disponibile

ISBN

978-3-16-150870-7

Numero di citazioni Wos

Nessuna citazione

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Numero di citazioni Scopus

Non Disponibile

Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni

Non Disponibile

Settori ERC

Non Disponibile

Codici ASJC

Non Disponibile