Between the General and the Unique: Overcoming the Nomothetic versus Idiographic Opposition
Abstract
In accordance with Windelband’s original proposal, the notions of nomothetic and idiographic are complementary terms, rather than an oppositional dyad. Given their dynamic and field-dependent nature, psychological phenomena are inherently unique―the relationship between their way of being and their constant becoming is mediated by the contingent conditions of the field. Therefore, science cannot be anything but idiographic―always facing a new unique event―while it is aimed at producing general knowledge of the nomothetic kind out of the ever- changing processes that unfold through irreversible time. The uniqueness of psychological phenomena makes it unfeasible for science to rely exclusively on inductive generalization that works through accumulation of empirical evidence provided by aggregated collections of specimens either within a single case (accumulation over time) or by assuming equivalence of exemplars across single cases subsumed under the same general class (a category viewed as a population). Abductive generalization can be a solution to the class-individuals relationship problem as it allows characterizing the dynamics of the unique case while it arrives at generalization.
Autore Pugliese
Tutti gli autori
-
S. Salvatore , J. Valsiner
Titolo volume/Rivista
THEORY & PSYCHOLOGY
Anno di pubblicazione
2010
ISSN
0959-3543
ISBN
Non Disponibile
Numero di citazioni Wos
Nessuna citazione
Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni
Non Disponibile
Numero di citazioni Scopus
Non Disponibile
Ultimo Aggiornamento Citazioni
Non Disponibile
Settori ERC
Non Disponibile
Codici ASJC
Non Disponibile
Condividi questo sito sui social